A controversial demolition at Onitsha Main Market this week has ignited outrage among traders and civil society groups, who accuse the Anambra State Government of defying a subsisting court order. For thousands of traders in Anambra, this market is not merely a place of business but “the heartbeat of survival.”
The Anambra Civil Society Network (ACSONet) has issued a strongly worded press statement, signed by its Chairman, Prince Chris Azor, accusing the state government of carrying out demolitions in parts of the historic market. According to ACSONet, these actions were conducted “in the early hours with armed security presence,” leaving traders anxious and distraught, with some reportedly scrambling to salvage goods as structures were pulled down.
Describing Onitsha Main Market as “a major economic nerve centre in the South East,” the group warned that any intervention affecting thousands of livelihoods must be “lawful, transparent and inclusive.” ACSONet based its concerns on constitutional provisions, citing Sections 6 and 287 of the 1999 Constitution, which mandate that court decisions are binding on all authorities. It also referenced Section 44, which protects citizens from compulsory acquisition of property without due process and compensation. The statement emphatically stressed, “Compliance with court orders is not discretionary. It is a constitutional duty.”
While acknowledging the government’s right to pursue urban renewal and infrastructure upgrades, ACSONet insisted that development must not override the rule of law. The network called for an immediate halt to further demolition until the matter is finally determined by the court. Furthermore, ACSONet urged the state government to convene urgent dialogue with recognized market leaders, affected traders, and civil society groups to clarify long-term plans, timelines, compensation arrangements, and relocation options. At the same time, traders were advised to maintain peace and pursue redress through lawful means.
The unfolding situation has significantly heightened tensions in Onitsha, with many observers noting that the handling of this matter could critically impact public trust in governance and institutional integrity within the state. For now, the message from civil society is clear: “obey the court, engage the people, and protect livelihoods.”
